Who it's for
Working insurance claims, not just repair jobs
A roofing or restoration contractor working an insurance claim is doing a different job than one scoping a repair directly for a homeowner — the estimate has to survive a carrier's review, not just get the work approved. PaxExact's typical configuration for that work is Estimate plus Claim Adjustment.
What's real today
- Evidence-linked scope records are live: a line item traces back to the specific photo and measurement behind it.
- The professional approval gate is live and enforced in code, not left to habit under deadline pressure.
- Case-file PDF export is in beta: the workflow is real; the exact output format is still being extended.
- Mobile capture with LiDAR room scanning and CRM connectors are both planned, not built, today — keep your current CRM in the meantime.
A typical configuration: Estimate plus Claim Adjustment
For a roofer or restoration contractor working insurance claims, the base product alone isn't quite enough — the estimate isn't just a job scope, it's the document a carrier will scrutinize before approving payment. The typical configuration pairs PaxExact Estimate, for the rooms, line items, and server-computed total, with Claim Adjustment, for the approval gate and case file that make the estimate defensible once someone whose interests don't align with yours is reading it.
That combination is optional in the sense that nothing forces it — a contractor doing straightforward repair work for a homeowner directly, with no claim in the picture, is better served by the base product alone. It's typical because contractors working claims consistently need both pieces, not because the platform requires it.
Why evidence-linked scope matters here specifically
A carrier reviewer doesn't take a line item's word for it. Evidence-linked scope is live today: a line item, a measurement, and a photo are separate, linked records, so a reviewer — yours, or the carrier's — can trace any number back to what was actually documented at the property, rather than relying on a narrative written afterward. That structure holds up under exactly the kind of scrutiny a contractor working claims has to expect.
A defensible record when a carrier pushes back
The professional approval gate is enforced in code: unapproved scope is excluded from totals and reports, so what reaches a carrier reflects a deliberate decision, not a draft that got ahead of itself. Once approved, the case file carries evidence, scope, and pricing state together, and PDF export is in beta — the underlying workflow is real and in production, and the output format itself is still being extended, so expect it to keep changing.
That combination — traceable scope plus an enforced gate plus a case file — is what gives you something to hand back when a carrier disputes a line, instead of reconstructing the justification from memory weeks after the fact.
What's optional on top of the typical configuration
Keep your CRM
Nothing here requires you to give up the system you already use to run your business. A dedicated mobile capture app with LiDAR-based room scanning is planned but not built — capture happens in a browser today. Connectors for CRMs and claim platforms, including a general integrations layer, are also planned, not built. Until those ship, PaxExact is meant to sit alongside your existing CRM for estimating and claim documentation, not replace it.
That's a deliberate sequencing, not an oversight: the approval gate, the evidence linking, and the case file are the pieces that make an estimate defensible, and those are the pieces built first. Field capture and system integrations extend how you get evidence in and data out, but they don't change whether the record itself holds up — which is why they're optional add-ons rather than requirements to start using Estimate and Claim Adjustment on a real claim today.
FAQ
Frequently asked
Do I need Claim Adjustment if I only do repair work, not claims?
No. If you're not working an insurance claim a carrier will review, the base Estimate product is the right fit on its own. Claim Adjustment earns its place when a carrier is going to scrutinize the estimate.
Can I capture evidence from a phone with LiDAR?
Not with a PaxExact app yet. Photo capture happens in a web browser today, and a dedicated mobile app with LiDAR-based room scanning is planned but not built. A LiDAR scan made in another app can be uploaded to a room from the web, in beta.
Will PaxExact replace my CRM?
Not today, and that's not the intent. CRM and claim-system connectors are planned, not built. Keep the CRM you run; PaxExact handles the estimate and, if you add it, the claim workflow.
Related