Skip to content
PaxExact

Compare

How to evaluate estimating software

A checklist for evaluating any property-loss estimating platform — not a comparison to any named competitor. Below it, PaxExact's own factual self-assessment against every point, read straight from the capability matrix.

The checklist

Questions worth asking any vendor

  1. 1. Evidence traceability

    Can every line item in an estimate be traced back to the specific photo or measurement that supports it — not just asserted in a narrative?

  2. 2. Pricing provenance

    Does every unit price carry a source (catalog, your own data, manual entry) and a way to tell how confident that figure is?

  3. 3. Human review

    Is there an explicit, enforced approval step before a scope becomes a priced, reportable estimate — not just a policy that can be skipped?

  4. 4. Commercial calculations

    Does the platform handle commercial-specific calculations (co-insurance, business income) with documented accept/override steps?

  5. 5. Export & defensibility

    Does the final output carry evidence, scope, and pricing together, or are they three separate documents assembled after the fact?

  6. 6. Data isolation

    Is your organization's data isolated such that another customer's request can't even confirm it exists?

  7. 7. API access

    Can your own systems read and write estimates programmatically, with scoped credentials and a versioned contract?

Self-assessment

Where PaxExact stands against its own checklist

See the full capability matrix for every feature, status, and evidence note.